Socrates (469-399 B.C.)
Plato (427-347 B.C.)
Supplementary reading: W.T. Jones The Classical Mind
Major topics:
- The Republic: a utopian society
- Concept of Psyche: tripartite psyche
- Ethics: the ideal of inner harmony
- Theory of Knowledge: Allegory of the Cave
- Theory of Reality: the concept of "Forms"
- Theory of the Origin of Ideas
Plato's Republic
- a Utopia
- Three classes in society:
- Rulers, warriors, merchants -- & slaves!
- Harmony among classes
- Rulers led by Reason
- "Philosopher-King"
- Favoured oligarchy, not democracy!
Note: Compare Skinner's Walden II,
where a "Psychologist-King"(?)
who uses behavioral technology
(rather than use of reason) is favored!
Plato's View of the Psyche The tripartite psyche
Part Seat of Seeks Characterizes
REASON Thinking Wisdom ESSENCE of
human beings
SPIRIT "Feeling" Success Assertiveness,
pugnacity
APPETITE Desire Bodily Indiscriminate
Pleasures desire
- Recognized individual differences according to
which part of psyche dominates
- Matching of aptitudes and occupations, leading to class differences
- The three parts of psyche, like the three
classes of society, often conflict
- Inner harmony desirable: Harmony leads to
happiness!
Plato's Ethics
- The search for Justice
- Justice results from the balance in the qualities of
-> Wisdom
-> Courage, &
-> Temperance
- Harmony as virtue
- Reason as a tool in realizing this virtue
(Comprehension of harmony and beauty in the
world with the use of reason brings happiness.)
Note: Plato's Ethics anticipates contemporary models
that implicitly value inner harmony, e.g., by assuming the desirability of
- resolving inner conflicts (Freud),
- "tension-reduction" (Lewin)
- reducing "cognitive dissonance" (Festinger)
Plato's Theory of Knowledge
The Allegory of the Cave
Human beings can only know sensory impressions of objects directly; not the objects themselves.
Implications of the allegory:
(a) a mistrust of sensory experience & thus of
observational data as a means of knowledge
(b) emphasis on REASON as a means of obtaining knowledge:
Like the light which illuminates the whole world,
REASON illuminates the mind:
[the myth of the sun]
Plato's view of Reality
__________________
Objects States of mind
___________________________
WORLD Higher Knowing
OF forms
REALITY ---------- -------------
Accessible Lower Thinking
to reason forms
___________________________
WORLD
OF Objects Believing
APPEARANCE ----------- ------------
Accessible Images Imagining
to the senses
---------------------------------
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
Additional References:
(1) W.T. Jones: The Classical Mind
(2) On the significance for psychology of
Aristotle's view of causality:
J.F. Rychlak: Personality and
Psychotherapy, 1981, pp. 2-7
Important topics
Aristotle's views on:
- Politics
- Knowledge: deductive logic
- Reality: form & matter
- Causality: four types of causes
- Biology & Psyche: scala naturae
- Ethics: happiness as good,
happiness as the degree of
actualization of potentials
Aristotle's Politics
- Authored "Politics" and "Nicomachean Ethics"
in which he said that a human is first
"a political creature whose nature is to live with others."
- Reflects the interest of the ancient
Greeks in the affairs of the state
- Suggested a descriptive typology of states
- NOTE: Emphasis on description
- as opposed to prescription
- contrast Plato's utopianism
Aristotle on Knowledge
- Did not always or absolutely mistrust
the senses as a source of knowledge
- Favoured empiricism in that he collected
"data" (e.g., biological specimens)
- Still, there was a strong "rationalist"
element in his approach to knowledge:
- propositions which he believed to be
true were based more on reasoning
than of the observation of facts.
- Pioneered in Deductive Logic.
- Showed how to proceed in disciplined
reasoning, or drawing conclusions correctly,
such that these conclusions must be true
if the premises are true.
All men are mortal - (Major Premise) |
Socrates is a man - (Minor Premise) } syllogism
Therefore, Socrates is mortal. |
Note: In deductive reasoning, one begins
with a universal generalization, and
proceeds to validate a particular instance.
- Contrast with Inductive reasoning
where one starts with a single observation,
continues to observe many instances, and
then try to arrive at a (hopefully universal)
generalization (e.g., a "law" of nature:
laws of gravity, or of learning)
Note:
How to make a connection between the
particular and the general, or among
one - many - & all
is a perennial problem in
(a) classifying, or putting several particular objects
--chemicals, plants, people--in a common category
(b) defining concepts (what is common to a class)
and classification (e.g., in botany)
(c) generalizing across a category, or universally
(e.g., in discovering universal laws in science)
Aristotle's Views of Reality
- Transformed Plato's distinction between Form & Object
- For Aristotle (unlike Plato), Matter and Form are
two inseparable aspects of any thing.
MATTER
- is the "stuff" of which things are made, e.g.,
- clay is matter of which bricks are made;
- bricks are matter of which walls are made . . .
- accounts for "thisness" (particularity) of the object
- has potential for actualization of its Form,
- e.g., food has potential to be flesh
FORM
- "shape" into which matter is molded,
- e.g., rectangularity of the brick
- essence of a thing whereby it
belongs to a class, e.g.,"humanness" whereby a body
is human, not merely flesh or animal
- accounts for "whatness" or general
(universal) category to which the object belongs
- implies actuality which the potential turns into at its best,
- e.g., an acorn can turn into an oak potential is actualized.
Note: In contrast with Plato,
(a) There is no separation (dualism)
of Object & Form, body & soul
(b) Forms are not merely abstract, imperceptible
"ideas"; they may be actualized in nature
(c) Body is not less "real" than soul;
both are part of Nature
Aristotle's legacy for Psychology.:
- a fully naturalistic (not idealist) view of humans,
- anticipates developmental theories (e.g., Piaget, Erikson), and "self-actualization" models (e.g., Maslow)
Aristotle's View of Causality
"Men do not know a thing till they
have grasped the 'why' of it."
Four Causes
- The statue metaphor: A statue is
- made of clay (material cause)
- through movements of sculpting
(efficient cause)
- as per a plan (formal cause)
- for a purpose, e.g., to decorate a
living room ( final cause)
MATERIAL:
- "That out of which a thing comes to
be and persists": e.g., bronze of statue
- In modern psych.: example difficult to give.
FORMAL:
- "The statement of essence, and its
genera {class}": e.g., octave
(defined) by the relation of 2 : 1
- In Psych.: Explain behavior with
reference to a personality type
(introvert), or disease category like
"Manic Depressive Psychosis."
EFFICIENT:
- "Primary source of change or coming
to rest" or "moving cause", e.g.,
builder as cause of building.
- In Psych.: "drive" as "moving cause."
or "stimulus" as a "prod" (Skinner) (unmoved mover)
FINAL:
- "That 'for the sake of which' a thing
is done", e.g., health as cause of
walking about.
- In Psych.: "Purpose" as cause of behavior
(controversial in modern psych).
Aristotle's Biology: An "empirical" approach
- Collected 500 animal specimens
- Studied chicken embryo at various
stages of development
The Scala Naturae :
- A continuum of life including plants,
animals and human beings
Aristotle's Three Types of Psyche
(a) NUTRITIVE PSYCHE
Plants - using nutrition
(a) - reproduction
(b) SENSITIVE PSYCHE
Animals - sensation, "awareness"
(a+b) - actualizing potential of
eyes, ears, etc.
(c) RATIONAL PSYCHE
Humans - makes thinking possible,
(a+b+c) - abstracts principles,
- synthesizes experience
Note: - Contrast with Plato;
- Places humans in nature
Aristotle's Laws of association
- We can call up impressions of
original sensation which may:
(a) follow one another (contiguity)
(b) be like one another (similarity)
(c) contrast one another (contrast)
- Note: Anticipates laws of learning and
principles of perception
Aristotle's View of Perception
One may mistake a stranger
- for a lover when excited by love, or
- for an enemy when excited by fear
Note: a statement of the idea that emotions
distort perception
- no naive trust in sensory experience.
Aristotle's View of the Good
- Happiness as Good!
- Anything is happy to the extent
that it is performing its function,
i.e., actualizing its Form
- This anticipates the "self-actualization" model of Maslow.