Elliot, Fisher, & Rennie (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.


1) Owning one's perspective: must recognise one's values, interests, assumptions, and the role they play in understanding. Disclosure of these is important.

2) Situating the sample: describe participants and their life circumstances.

3) Grounding in examples: present examples of the data to reveal the fit of the analytical procedures and the meanings garnered from them.

4) Providing credibility checks: give methods for checking the results such as checking with informants, multiple analysts, analytical auditor, comparing two or more qualitative perspectives, "triangulation" with quantitative data.

5) Coherence: understanding is presented in a 'narrative' or other structure that maintains the nuances of meaning through integration of the data.

6) Accomplishing General vs. specific research task: describe the limits of extending results from one sample to a general case and also give a systematic and comprehensive description of the specific understanding and limitations of it in case studies.

7) Resonating with readers: the account provides "resonance" or meaning for the reader/reviewer as an accurate portrayal of the phenomenon.

Back to top of page


Created with the CoffeeCup HTML Editor