G.
E. Moore (1873-1958):
Common
Sense and Ordinary Language
Defended
Common Sense by
suggesting others "paradoxically" contradict themselves in doubting "banally
obvious truths" (eg. material things, space & time, other minds, ...)
Moore's
follower, Norman Malcolm,
suggests that:
"Ordinary
language" expressions are free from "Philosophical
Paradox" or self-contradiction because they provide useful or "pragmatic"
truths
People
learn the meaning of expressions through standard cases or "exemplars"
of paradigms
Wittgenstein
responds: The "common-sense philosopher is not the common-sense man"
Ludwig
Wittgenstein (1889-1951):
Language
games and traditions
1922
- Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus:
The
"picture theory" of knowledge
1953
- Philosophical Investigations: Criticized representational theories
suggesting that statements about internal perceptions (eg. "I'm in pain")
are expressions of such states rather than descriptions of objects
Reminiscent
of Peter Abellard's resolution to the medieval "nominalism vs. realism
debate", Wittgenstein
offers a perspective of neo-conceptualism
He
suggests that the categorical terms we use in science represent real things
(like realism)
however they are not objects or things (like
nominalism) but rather the creative expressions
of human experience (like conceptualism)
Mind, pain,
memory, learning, thinking & intelligence
are
real, but they are not entities or things
There
is not a limited
set of defining or "essential features" (list of propositions or statements)
that describe such concepts
Conceptual
confusion arises from failing to recognize
our
concepts as part of a loose cluster of expressions
which
are characterized by a having "family resemblance"
Terminal
explanations are accepted when we decide to
stop asking "why?" and stop our investigation. We can never fully explain
human action, however, we can understand it!
We learn
to use concepts paradigmatically
(by
example) through various "language games"
Language
games are the activities (praxes) of human
communication and interpretation where contexts for understanding concepts
and oneself are provided by the "forms of
life" or traditions in which we live
While
language games involve specific persons,
they
are part of longer standing traditions
All knowledge
is bound to the dialectics of language games where there are no "private
languages" and no trans-historical or trans-cultural "universals"
Social
Constructionism: Volkerpsychologie
and contemporary
Cultural
Psychology
Philosophy
of science and the sociology of knowledge
Max
Scheler: Various types of knowledge not stages
Kurt
Danziger: Constructing the Subject, Naming the Mind
Thomas
Kuhn: The structure of Scientific Revolutions
Richard
Rorty: Mind and the Mirror of Nature
Richard
Bernstein: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism
Charles
Taylor: Sources of the self & Moral Topographies
Psychology
on both sides of the Atlantic
Rom
Harre: Moral Orders of the social world
Ken
Gergen: The "dance" of interpretations
John
Shotter: "Knowing of the third kind"
The
negotiation of meaning is a creative process
of groups
of people in concert, voices....
Feminism
and the philosophy of science
Sandra Harding
Maragret Benston
Winnie Thom feminism
in Canadian social science
Readings
on Feminism